Skip to Main Content

Cost-Effectiveness of Improved Primary Care Treatment of Depression in Women in Chile

2010

This article, published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, describes a modified version of a previously developed Markov cohort model to compare the cost-effectiveness of usual care and improved stepped care among women with major depression in Chile. 

The lifetime cost-effectiveness results are measured in international dollars per quality-adjusted life year (I$/QALY). This international dollar takes into account the purchasing power parity of each country.

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of usual care is $113 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, versus no treatment, whereas stepped care had an ICER of I$468 per QALY versus usual care. Results are most sensitive to variation in recurrent episode coverage, marginally sensitive to cost of treatment, and insensitive to changes in health-state utility of depression and rate of recurrence. Using Chile’s per-capita gross domestic product as a threshold for cost-effectiveness (I$9900/QALY in 2003), the authors conclude that the improved stepped care program is a very cost-effective treatment for depression in Chile.

 

Source:

Siskind D, Araya R, Kim J. Cost-Effectiveness of Improved Primary Care Treatment of Depression in Women in Chile. British Journal of Psychiatry 2010; 197 (4): 291-296. http://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.109.068957