Resources Repository
-
ReportPublication 2018Understanding the Economics of Microbial Threats: Proceedings of a Workshop
This report follows a June 2018, Forum on Microbial Threats that was held at the …
This report follows a June 2018, Forum on Microbial Threats that was held at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. This was a 1.5-day public workshop with the goal being an assessment of the current understanding of the interaction of infectious disease threats and economic activity in order to suggest future areas of research. This workshop built on prior work of the Forum and aimed to build more mutual understanding between those in…
Evidence Synthesis | Technology Assessment | Health Outcomes | Health/Medicine | Infectious Diseases | Policy/Regulation | Global Governance | Clinical Care | Business/Industry | Economics/Finance | Global -
ArticlePublication 2015A Conceptual Model for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening
General frameworks of the cancer screening process are available, but none directly compare the process …
General frameworks of the cancer screening process are available, but none directly compare the process in detail across different organ sites. This limits the ability of medical and public health professionals to develop and evaluate coordinated screening programs that apply resources and population management strategies available for one cancer site to other sites. This paper presents a conceptual model that incorporates a single screening episode for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers into a unified framework based…
Evidence Synthesis | Test Performance | Health Outcomes | Health/Medicine | Preferences/Values | Microsimulation | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis | Chronic Disease/Risk | Health Systems | Clinical Care | Science/Technology | North America -
ReportPublication 2015Improving Diagnosis in Health Care
Getting the right diagnosis is a key aspect of health care - it provides an …
Getting the right diagnosis is a key aspect of health care - it provides an explanation of a patient's health problem and informs subsequent health care decisions. The diagnostic process is a complex, collaborative activity that involves clinical reasoning and information gathering to determine a patient's health problem. This report, Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, explains that diagnostic errors-inaccurate or delayed diagnoses-persist throughout all settings of care and continue to harm an unacceptable number of patients.…
Test Performance | Health Outcomes | Value of Information | Health/Medicine | Probability/Bayes | Health Systems | North America -
ReportPublication 2015Opioid Dependence: Final Report
This report from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) examines the comparative effectiveness and value …
This report from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) examines the comparative effectiveness and value of interventions for the management of opioid dependence. The goals of the report are to document the federal and New England state regulations affecting treatment options, provide an overview of existing clinical guidelines and payer coverage policies, and summarize the evidence on the different management approaches for opioid dependence, including special considerations for adolescents. An appendix is provided by ICER.…
Evidence Synthesis | Technology Assessment | Health Outcomes | Health/Medicine | Preferences/Values | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis | Chronic Disease/Risk | Mental Health | Health Systems | Policy/Regulation | Business/Industry | Government/Law | Science/Technology | North America -
ReportPublication 2023Roadmap for Increasing the Usefulness and Impact of Patient-Preference Studies in Decision Making in Health
This ISPOR Task Force report examines the integration of patient preferences into healthcare decision-making, emphasizing …
This ISPOR Task Force report examines the integration of patient preferences into healthcare decision-making, emphasizing the growing significance of both qualitative and quantitative methods for studying these preferences. The report synthesizes current best practices to enhance the utility and impact of patient-preference studies. The methods involved reviewing existing literature and practices to construct the ISPOR Roadmap for Patient Preferences in Decision Making. This roadmap encourages collaboration among researchers, decision-makers, patients, patient groups, and other stakeholders.…
Evidence Synthesis | Health Outcomes | Health/Medicine | Preferences/Values -
ReviewPublication 2023Inclusion of Environmental Spillovers in Applied Economic Evaluations of Healthcare Products
This review examines the inclusion of environmental spillovers in economic evaluations of healthcare products and …
This review examines the inclusion of environmental spillovers in economic evaluations of healthcare products and health technology assessments (HTA). Environmental spillovers, such as CO2 emissions, water and energy consumption, and waste disposal, significantly impact human and planetary health but are often excluded from HTAs. The review's objective is to identify economic evaluations and guidelines incorporating environmental dimensions. Methods included electronic searches of PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE, as well as official health agencies' guidelines. Documents were…
Evidence Synthesis | Technology Assessment | Health/Medicine | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis | Environmental Health | Climate/Environment | Global -
ReviewPublication 2023Systematic Literature Review of Gaps and Challenges in Value Assessment of Biosimilars: ISPOR Special Interest Group Report
This study addresses the gaps and challenges in the value assessment of biosimilars and proposes …
This study addresses the gaps and challenges in the value assessment of biosimilars and proposes potential approaches to mitigate them. A multidisciplinary team of biosimilar experts conducted a systematic review of literature and engaged in review rounds to identify these challenges. The article suggests that health technology assessment agencies should accept the comparability exercise approved by regulatory authorities and conduct price comparisons for biosimilars reimbursed for the same indication as the reference biologic. In cases…
Evidence Synthesis | Technology Assessment | Health/Medicine | Preferences/Values | Policy/Regulation -
ArticlePublication 2023Evaluation of Diversity of Clinical Trials Informing Health Technology Assessments in the United States: A 5-Year Analysis of Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Assessments
The study assessed the diversity of clinical trials informing assessments by the Institute for Clinical …
The study assessed the diversity of clinical trials informing assessments by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) over five years (2017-2021). It conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 208 pivotal trials across 31 conditions. Findings revealed inadequate representation of racial/ethnic minorities and older adults, with Blacks/African Americans, American Indians/Alaska Natives, and Hispanics/Latinos being notably underrepresented. Whites, Asians, and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islanders were adequately represented. US-based trials better represented Blacks/African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos but…
Evidence Synthesis | Technology Assessment | Health/Medicine | North America -
ArticlePublication 2023Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards - Value of Information (CHEERS-VOI): Explanation and Elaboration
The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards Value of Information (CHEERS-VOI) 2022 checklist aims to …
The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards Value of Information (CHEERS-VOI) 2022 checklist aims to standardize reporting of Value of Information (VOI) analyses conducted alongside economic evaluations, ensuring transparent, reproducible, and high-quality reporting. Developed through a Delphi study, the CHEERS-VOI checklist includes 33 items, with 7 modifications and 6 new reporting criteria, building upon the existing CHEERS statement. Delphi participants rated candidate items through three survey rounds, resulting in the final checklist. This checklist should…
Evidence Synthesis | Value of Information | Health/Medicine