Skip to Main Content

Combining A4R and MCDA in Priority Setting for Health

2018

Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has been proposed as a method for determining the criteria to be used in health technology assessment. A standard criticism of MCDA is that it lacks attention to securing legitimacy for its decisions. Accountability for reasonableness (A4R) proposes four conditions (publicity, relevance, revisability and enforcement) that must be met if legitimacy and fairness are to be ascribed to decisions about priority setting.The relevance condition of A4R has been criticized for its vagueness because it lacks a focus on criteria selection. Combining the two methods addresses the central criticisms of each and provides a way of addressing the problem of priority setting for health.

Source:

Daniels N. Combining A4R and MCDA in Priority Setting for Health. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2018; 16 (Supp 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0124-9