US Value Assessment Frameworks—Recommendations of the ISPOR Special Task Force Report (7)


This is part 7 of 7 of the ISPOR Special Task Force report “A Health Economics Approach to US Value Assessment Frameworks.” This summary section first lists key points from each of the six sections of the report, followed by six key recommendations. The Special Task Force took a health economics approach to the question of whether a health plan should cover and reimburse a specific technology, beginning with the view that the conventional cost-per-quality-adjusted life-year metric has both strengths as a starting point and recognized limitations. This report calls for the development of a more comprehensive economic evaluation that could include novel elements of value (e.g., insurance value and equity) as part of either an “augmented” cost-effectiveness analysis or a multicriteria decision analysis. 

Given an aggregation of elements to a measure of value, consistent use of a cost-effectiveness threshold can help ensure the maximization of health gain and well-being for a given budget. The six recommendations are to: 1) be explicit about decision context and perspective in value assessment frameworks; 2) base health plan coverage and reimbursement decisions on an evaluation of the incremental costs and benefits of health care technologies as is provided by cost-effectiveness analysis; 3) develop value thresholds to serve as one important input to help guide coverage and reimbursement decisions; 4) manage budget constraints and affordability on the basis of cost-effectiveness principles; 5) test and consider using structured deliberative processes for health plan coverage and reimbursement decisions; and 6) explore and test novel elements of benefit to improve value measures that reflect the perspectives of both plan members and patients.



Garrison LP, Neumann PJ, Willke RJ et al. A Health Economics Approach to US Value Assessment Frameworks—Summary and Recommendations of the ISPOR Special Task Force Report [7]. Value in Health 2018; 21 (2): 161-165.