Accounting for Technical, Ethical, and Political Factors in Priority Setting
2016
This article investigates two cases of priority setting to explore how, in addition to technical considerations, ethical and political factors shape the allocation of health resources. First, they discuss how Thai authorities adjudicated a coverage decision for HLA-B*1502 screening, which meets the national cost-effectiveness threshold for only some of the conditions it can detect. Second, they consider England’s Cancer Drugs Fund to investigate the interplay of technical decision making and political reality.
The findings suggest four concluding observations for policy makers and others considering priority-setting processes. First, different methods can produce conflicting recommendations, which makes priority setting very complex. Second, robust processes for generating and weighing political, ethical, and technical evidence are essential because there is no absolute standard by which resource allocation decisions can be made. Third, priority setting is inherently political, and improving its technical and ethical validity means constructing political importance for these other factors. Fourth, transparency in the trade-offs required to set priorities is important ethically and can help build support politically.
Accounting for Technical, Ethical, and Political Factors in Priority Setting
Source:
Kieslich K, Bump JB, Frithjof Norheim O et al. Accounting for Technical, Ethical, and Political Factors in Priority Setting. Health Systems & Reform 2016; 2 (1): 51-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2016.1124169